From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263227AbTDYIwu (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 04:52:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263482AbTDYIwu (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 04:52:50 -0400 Received: from node-d-1ea6.a2000.nl ([62.195.30.166]:23022 "EHLO laptop.fenrus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263227AbTDYIwt (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2003 04:52:49 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.5.67-mm4 & IRQ balancing From: Arjan van de Ven Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com To: Bill Davidsen Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo , Andrew Morton , Philippe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gramoull=E9?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wtMHMoUaiZYlgUGxWFi7" Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Message-Id: <1051261420.1391.1.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 (1.2.4-2) Date: 25 Apr 2003 11:03:40 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-wtMHMoUaiZYlgUGxWFi7 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 23:32, Bill Davidsen wrote: > And everybody can write one and try to measure the difference it > makes. I welcome this; however if you want to be lazy; the irqbalanced I wrote has the policy separated from the infrastructure so it's relatively easy to play with just that ;) --=-wtMHMoUaiZYlgUGxWFi7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+qPnsxULwo51rQBIRAnWNAJ9CwhvEm8TBT+jkynUqBKMAPboBcwCcDH60 k7rDvyxLYHk5Ft1BjIGtN0o= =jnQ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wtMHMoUaiZYlgUGxWFi7--