From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263120AbTEBUu0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2003 16:50:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263084AbTEBUuZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2003 16:50:25 -0400 Received: from mailrelay1.lanl.gov ([128.165.4.101]:19870 "EHLO mailrelay1.lanl.gov") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263120AbTEBUuX (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2003 16:50:23 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.5.68-mm4 From: Steven Cole To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: <1051908541.2166.40.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> References: <20030502020149.1ec3e54f.akpm@digeo.com> <1051905879.2166.34.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <20030502133405.57207c48.akpm@digeo.com> <1051908541.2166.40.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1051909277.2163.47.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk Date: 02 May 2003 15:01:18 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 14:49, Steven Cole wrote: > On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 14:34, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Steven Cole wrote: > > > > > > For what it's worth, kexec has worked for me on the following > > > two systems. > > > ... > > > 00:03.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08) > > > > Are you using eepro100 or e100? I found that e100 failed to bring up the > > interface on restart ("failed selftest"), but eepro100 was OK. > > CONFIG_EEPRO100=y > # CONFIG_EEPRO100_PIO is not set > # CONFIG_E100 is not set > > I can test E100 again to verify if that would help. > # CONFIG_EEPRO100 is not set CONFIG_E100=y Well, e100 works for me with kexec. Sure is quick to just do: cp arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-2.5.68-mm4x do-kexec.sh /boot/vmlinuz-2.5.68-mm4x and no running /sbin/lilo. Nice. ( I put do-kexec.sh and kexec in /usr/local/bin ) Steven