From: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm1
Date: 06 May 2003 10:35:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1052238949.2166.145.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m17k949jeh.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 09:36, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com> writes:
>
> > Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have one machine for testing which is running X, and a kexec reboot
> > > glitches the video system when initiated from runlevel 5. Kexec works fine
> > > from runlevel 3.
> >
> > Yes, there are a lot of driver issues with kexec. Device drivers will assume
> > that the hardware is in the state which the BIOS left behind.
> >
> > In this case, the Linus device driver's shutdown functions are obviously not
> > leaving the card in a pristine state. A lot of drivers _do_ do this
> > correctly. But some don't.
> >
> > It seems that kexec is really supposed to be invoked from run level 1. ie:
> > you run all your system's shutdown scripts before switching. If you'd done
> > that then you wouldn't have been running X and all would be well.
> >
> > do-kexec.sh is for the very impatient ;)
>
> The biggest issue with kexec when you are in X is that nothing
> tells X to shutdown. So you have to at least shutdown X manually.
>
> Eric
Thanks for the answers. Kexec is pretty cool as it stands. I hope
Linus merges it soon.
Steven "very impatient" Cole
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-06 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-05 6:16 2.5.69-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-05-05 15:32 ` 2.5.69-mm1 Andrei Ivanov
2003-05-05 16:45 ` 2.5.69-mm1 Greg KH
2003-05-06 9:49 ` 2.5.69-mm1 Andrei Ivanov
2003-05-05 18:44 ` 2.5.69-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-05-05 21:01 ` 2.5.69-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-06 11:09 ` 2.5.69-mm1 Dipankar Sarma
2003-05-06 12:02 ` 2.5.69-mm1 David S. Miller
2003-05-06 15:25 ` 2.5.69-mm1 Dipankar Sarma
2003-05-06 14:20 ` 2.5.69-mm1 David S. Miller
2003-05-06 15:47 ` 2.5.69-mm1 Dipankar Sarma
2003-05-05 21:02 ` 2.5.69-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-06 14:33 ` 2.5.69-mm1 Steven Cole
2003-05-06 15:33 ` 2.5.69-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-05-06 15:36 ` 2.5.69-mm1 Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-06 16:35 ` Steven Cole [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1052238949.2166.145.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov \
--to=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--subject='Re: 2.5.69-mm1' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).