From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261207AbTEKVm4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2003 17:42:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261251AbTEKVm4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2003 17:42:56 -0400 Received: from netline-be1.netline.ch ([195.141.226.32]:41990 "EHLO netline-be1.netline.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261207AbTEKVmz (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2003 17:42:55 -0400 Subject: Re: Improved DRM support for cant_use_aperture platforms From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= To: Dave Jones Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20030511195543.GA15528@suse.de> References: <200305101009.h4AA9GZi012265@napali.hpl.hp.com> <1052653415.12338.159.camel@thor> <16062.37308.611438.5934@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20030511195543.GA15528@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Organization: Debian, XFree86 Message-Id: <1052690133.10752.176.camel@thor> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.3.1.99 (Preview Release) Date: 11 May 2003 23:55:33 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Son, 2003-05-11 at 21:55, Dave Jones wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 11:09:00AM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > > Michel> but there'd have to be fallbacks for older kernels (this is > > Michel> against 2.4.20-ben8): > > > > OK, we have a chicken & egg problem then: I could obviously add Linux > > kernel version checks where needed, but to do that, the patch first > > needs to go into the kernel. Mind elaborating on that? I don't see such a problem as you don't need version checks for anything the patch itself adds, only for kernel infrastructure that isn't available in older kernels (down to 2.4). > > Dave, would you mind applying the patch to your tree? Then once > > Linus picked it up, I can send a new patch to dri-devel. Or does > > someone have a better suggestion? > > With Linus doing the DRI sync-ups himself, maybe just pushing it his > way directly would work.. It's my impression that he prefers just merging from DRI CVS to pushing something back, so putting it in there first seems like it would be the easiest way to me. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer