linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shaheed R. Haque" <srhaque@iee.org>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: shaheed <srhaque@iee.org>,
	Felipe Alfaro Solana <yo@felipe-alfaro.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6 must-fix list, v2
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 10:19:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1052990397.3ec35bbd5e008@netmail.pipex.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1052946917.883.25.camel@icbm>


Quoting Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>:

> More important to me is getting it into Red Hat and SuSE. I have heard
> encouring words from Matt Wilson at Red Hat about schedutils possibly
> going into Rawhide soon. It would not hurt to let Red Hat/SuSE/whoever
> know that schedutils is something their customers want.
>
> Both Red Hat and SuSE's kernels have the CPU affinity system calls
> merged, so you do not need to wait until 2.6 is out to use them.

These are the distros I am interested in too. I knew it was in RH AS/ES, but 
are you saying it is in RH9.0? That would be good news.

On the technical point, I tried out taskset in rc.sysinit, and as you said, it 
works just fine. On reflection, I feel that editing rc.sysinit is not the right 
answer given the confidence/competence level of our customers' typical 
sysadmins: but I can see that a carefully crafted rc5.d/S00aaaaa script could 
set the affinity of the executing shell, and its parent(s) upto init to fix all 
subsequent rcN.d children in the desired manner.

I do suspect that other commercial users will also baulk at editing rc.sysint, 
and so have to brew the same rcN.d solution. Now, the rcN.d script hackery 
would be greatly simplified if taskset had a mode of "set the affinity of the 
identified process, and all its parent processes upto init". Would you accept a 
patch to taskset along those lines?

I think that would be a very acceptable, easy to deploy, solution.

Thoughts? Shaheed



  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-15  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-12 11:20 Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6? Shaheed R. Haque
2003-04-12 12:11 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-12 12:24 ` Antonio Vargas
2003-04-12 14:54   ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-12 18:23   ` Robert Love
2003-04-12 19:56 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-04-12 20:02   ` Robert Love
2003-04-13  8:30     ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-04-13 14:28       ` Robert Love
2003-05-13 11:49         ` 2.6 must-fix list, v2 Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-13 20:02           ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-13 22:46             ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-14  2:42               ` Steven Cole
2003-05-14 11:49                 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-14 13:08                   ` Steven Cole
2003-05-13 22:49             ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-14 11:02               ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-05-14 15:59                 ` Robert Love
2003-05-14 16:04                   ` Robert Love
2003-05-14 21:01                   ` shaheed
2003-05-14 21:15                     ` Robert Love
2003-05-15  9:19                       ` Shaheed R. Haque [this message]
2003-05-15 15:32                         ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 20:07                           ` shaheed
2003-05-15 20:20                             ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 20:24                             ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 21:30                               ` shaheed
2003-04-13  3:52   ` Re: Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6? Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-15 11:39   ` [HOWTO] Emulate processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6 \"shaheed r. haque\"
2003-04-14 22:40 ` [RFC] patch to allow CPUs to be reserved to callers of sys_setaffinity [was Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6?] shaheed
2003-05-01 20:19 ` Working .config for a Dell 2650 for 2.5.6x? (was Re: Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6?) shaheed
2003-05-12 22:54 2.6 must-fix list, v2 Andrew Morton
2003-05-12 22:55 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-13  4:05   ` viro
2003-05-13  5:00     ` Greg KH
2003-05-13 11:36   ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-13 13:57     ` Dave Jones
2003-05-13 15:16       ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-13 15:22         ` Dave Jones
2003-05-13 15:32           ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-13 15:47             ` Dave Jones
2003-05-13 16:02               ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-13 16:09                 ` Dave Jones
2003-05-13 16:27                   ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-13 16:45                     ` Dave McCracken
2003-05-13 16:53                       ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-13 22:50                         ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-13 17:38                 ` Dave Jones
2003-05-13 17:59                   ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-13 15:59     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-13 16:11       ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-13 18:09         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-13 20:15         ` Chris Friesen
2003-05-13 20:25           ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-13 13:57   ` Alan Cox
2003-05-13 15:00     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-05-13 15:12       ` Jens Axboe
2003-05-13 15:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-13 15:50       ` Jeff Garzik
2003-05-13 16:59         ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-05-13 20:07           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-05-13 20:12             ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-05-13 19:51       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-05-13 20:17       ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-13 22:25         ` Dave Jones
2003-05-13 22:52           ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-13 23:43           ` Russell King
2003-05-14  8:09             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
     [not found]         ` <mailman.1052866140.9783.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2003-05-14  2:32           ` Pete Zaitcev
2003-05-14 16:21         ` Tom Rini
2003-05-17  8:58       ` Pavel Machek
2003-05-13 15:47     ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-13 15:06       ` Alan Cox
2003-05-13 16:20         ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-13 17:52       ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-05-13 18:11         ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-17  8:56     ` Pavel Machek
2003-05-13  0:22 ` Greg KH
2003-05-13  1:57 Chuck Ebbert
     [not found] <20030512155417.67a9fdec.akpm@digeo.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <20030512155511.21fb1652.akpm@digeo.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-05-13  6:00   ` Andi Kleen
2003-05-13 17:12 James Bottomley
2003-05-13 18:11 ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-13 18:18   ` James Bottomley
2003-05-13 19:14     ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-13 20:04 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-14  2:05 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-05-14  2:43 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-14 12:05   ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-14 18:21 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1052990397.3ec35bbd5e008@netmail.pipex.net \
    --to=srhaque@iee.org \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=yo@felipe-alfaro.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).