From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264592AbTGCPty (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:49:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264590AbTGCPty (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:49:54 -0400 Received: from 153.Red-213-4-13.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.4.13.153]:16912 "EHLO small.felipe-alfaro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264593AbTGCPsG (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:48:06 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.5.74-mm1 From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Andrew Morton Cc: LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: <20030703023714.55d13934.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20030703023714.55d13934.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1057248147.599.2.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 03 Jul 2003 18:02:27 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 11:37, Andrew Morton wrote: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.5/2.5.74/2.5.74-mm1/ > > . Included Con's CPU scheduler changes. Feedback on the effectiveness of > this and the usual benchmarks would be interesting. > > Changes to the CPU scheduler tend to cause surprising and subtle problems > in areas where you least expect it, and these do take a long time to > materialise. Alterations in there need to be made carefully and cautiously. > We shall see... Currently testing all the new things... >>From what I've seen until date, the new scheduler patches are very, very promising. I like them very much, but I still prefer Mike+Ingo combo patch a little bit more for my laptop. Will keep you informed if I see something strange ;-)