From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268337AbTGIOJU (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:09:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268339AbTGIOJU (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:09:20 -0400 Received: from [62.151.11.132] ([62.151.11.132]:54691 "EHLO smtp2.yaonline.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268337AbTGIOJS (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:09:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] O3int interactivity for 2.5.74-mm2 From: Luis Miguel Garcia To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1057763278.3882.14.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 09 Jul 2003 17:08:00 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If the prople is all the time complaining about the good that was the interactivity in the first 2.5 series, is it completly imposible to revert some of the changes in order to see what has happened? Perhaps this way, a bug can be identified, or a bad piece of code. Does this make sense? Regards, -- Luis Miguel Garcia Palencia / Spain