From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269961AbTGKNep (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:34:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269962AbTGKNep (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:34:45 -0400 Received: from 69-55-72-150.ppp.netsville.net ([69.55.72.150]:36551 "EHLO tiny.suse.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269961AbTGKNeo (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:34:44 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.4.22-pre3 and reiserfs boot problem From: Chris Mason To: Stephan von Krawczynski Cc: marcelo@conectiva.com.br, ia6432@inbox.ru, green@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrea@suse.de In-Reply-To: <20030711152738.5b26fb4c.skraw@ithnet.com> References: <20030710191254.093354d2.skraw@ithnet.com> <1057929320.13317.26.camel@tiny.suse.com> <20030711152738.5b26fb4c.skraw@ithnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1057931282.13318.39.camel@tiny.suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 11 Jul 2003 09:48:02 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 09:27, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > My first guess is that blk_oversized_queue is false but there aren't any > > requests left. That will pretty much spin in __get_request_wait with > > irqs off, which sounds similar to what he's hitting. > > Why is it I am only seeing it on a big device of 320 GB? Even 60GB mount > without problems... Honestly not sure. I could make a better guess if you got a stack trace with nmi_watchdog on, so we could see which part of the reiserfs mount process was causing problems. The bug would be easier to hit with smaller blocksizes, I'm running tests now with ext and 1k blocksizes. -chris