From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270588AbTGNH5o (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 03:57:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270586AbTGNH5o (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 03:57:44 -0400 Received: from [81.2.110.254] ([81.2.110.254]:12793 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270582AbTGNH5i (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 03:57:38 -0400 Subject: Re: Remove net drivers depending on OBSOLETE From: Alan Cox To: Adrian Bunk Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, akpm@digeo.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20030713222945.GC12104@fs.tum.de> References: <20030713222945.GC12104@fs.tum.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1058169900.554.22.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 14 Jul 2003 09:05:01 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sul, 2003-07-13 at 23:29, Adrian Bunk wrote: > The following three net drivers depend in both 2.4 and 2.5 on > CONFIG_OBSOLETE: > - FMV18X > - SEEQ8005 > - SK_G16 > > Since CONFIG_OBSOLETE is never set they are not selectable. > Is there any reason why they should stay in the kernel or would you > accept a patch that removes these drivers? Seeq hardware turns up now and again, sk_g16 is a pretty rare bit of hardware but I thought people had it working in current 2.4, fmv18x I've no idea about. I'll take a look at them