From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270130AbTGNLDP (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 07:03:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270152AbTGNLDP (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 07:03:15 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:50369 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270130AbTGNLDN (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 07:03:13 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.0-test1 From: Alan Cox To: John Bradford Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , torvalds@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <200307141101.h6EB1OxV000586@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> References: <200307141101.h6EB1OxV000586@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1058181324.606.45.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 14 Jul 2003 12:15:24 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Llu, 2003-07-14 at 12:01, John Bradford wrote: > > The point of the test versions is to make more people realize that they > > need testing > > Are all the known security issues in 2.4 now fixed in 2.6.0-test1? No, and several more have been added in 2.6-test only. > This has been the only major reason for keeping of most of my > production machines running 2.4 for quite a while. If not, can we get > the fixes in at the earliest opportunity? Sure.. send the fixes to Linus