From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270828AbTGNURu (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:17:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266118AbTGNUQc (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:16:32 -0400 Received: from CPE-65-29-18-15.mn.rr.com ([65.29.18.15]:42181 "EHLO www.enodev.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270824AbTGNUPY (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:15:24 -0400 Subject: Re: Alan Shih: "TCP IP Offloading Interface" From: Shawn To: Alan Cox Cc: David griego , jgarzik@pobox.com, alan@storlinksemi.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1058213152.561.129.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <1058213152.561.129.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1058214639.24180.120.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 14 Jul 2003 15:30:39 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Don't push him... he'll do it! We're talking "floor sweepings" frames! "Too rank for sausage" frames! On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 15:05, Alan Cox wrote: > Also if its 1MHz per 1Mbit worse case and your ToE engine isnt entirely > hardware paths capable of sustaining 10Gbit/sec, what happens when I hit > you with 10Gbit of carefully chosen non optimal frames ?