From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S269133AbTGORQP (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:16:15 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269144AbTGORQP
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:16:15 -0400
Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:15815
	"EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S269133AbTGORQN (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:16:13 -0400
Subject: Re: -ac kernels
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Ro0tSiEgE LKML <lkml@ro0tsiege.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <005b01c34aeb$e1c54e00$0500000a@bp>
References: <005b01c34aeb$e1c54e00$0500000a@bp>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1058290104.3845.49.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) 
Date: 15 Jul 2003 18:28:30 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Maw, 2003-07-15 at 17:12, Ro0tSiEgE LKML wrote:
> What patches in the -ac kernels get put into the mainstream kernel? For
> instance, I would assume that fixes in 2.6.0-test1-ac1 would make it into
> 2.6.0-test2, but I'm not sure how that works, surely no one is just dropping
> those fixes and not applying them at some point to the mainline kernels. So
> I guess my question is, at what point does Linus' tree sync with Alan's?

I'm trying to hoover up patches that make things work so it can get more
people testing more and more driver stuff so that when Linus is back I
can nuke his mailbox from orbit...