From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271100AbTGPUDA (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:03:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271105AbTGPUC7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:02:59 -0400 Received: from AMarseille-201-1-6-168.w80-11.abo.wanadoo.fr ([80.11.137.168]:9255 "EHLO gaston") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271100AbTGPUC5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:02:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] radeonfb 0.1.9 against 2.4.21pre2 (fwd) From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: ajoshi@kernel.crashing.org Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , lkml In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1058386621.515.105.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 16 Jul 2003 22:17:03 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 20:10, ajoshi@kernel.crashing.org wrote: > Many of these have already been addressed in 0.1.9, though I added the > usage of the native clock, assertion for it, the dvi blanking, and the > nolcd passthrough. For things like the updated PM code, a patch would be > helpful. Ok, I don't know what's up here, maybe you send the wrong patch to Marcelo or whatever, but what I have here labelled 0.1.9 doesn't contain these. Native clock for LCD is definitely not here, DVI blanking neither, though nolcd passthrough is there. Ben.