From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271395AbTGQMP7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:15:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271400AbTGQMP6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:15:58 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:30158 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271395AbTGQMPx (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:15:53 -0400 Subject: Re: BK Licence: Protocols and Research From: Alan Cox To: Rory Browne Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20030717120505.GA22304@zion.nuigalway.ie> References: <20030717120505.GA22304@zion.nuigalway.ie> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1058444890.8621.44.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 17 Jul 2003 13:28:18 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Iau, 2003-07-17 at 13:05, Rory Browne wrote: > Would previous activity in the area of developing a product which > contains substantially similary features to Bitkeeper preclude users from > using the Free Bitkeeper software? Hire a lawyer or talk to the company selling it. This list is definitely the wrong place to ask about it.