archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <>
To: "William M. Quarles" <>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Kernel 2.4 CPU Arch issues]
Date: 21 Jul 2003 07:39:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Llu, 2003-07-21 at 01:25, William M. Quarles wrote:
> Well, wouldn't changing the gcc -march option and/or adding -mcpu 
> options for the various processors in the Makefile make a difference, as 
> the patchfile suggests?

Currently - no. gcc knows a lot more processor names that require individual
unique optimisation

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-21  6:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-20 23:29 [Fwd: Re: Kernel 2.4 CPU Arch issues] William M. Quarles
2003-07-21  0:00 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-21  0:25   ` William M. Quarles
2003-07-21  6:39     ` Alan Cox [this message]
2003-07-21 19:23       ` jw schultz
2003-07-23  1:17   ` J.A. Magallon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).