From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270486AbTGXFGY (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2003 01:06:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270490AbTGXFGY (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2003 01:06:24 -0400 Received: from CPE-65-29-18-15.mn.rr.com ([65.29.18.15]:29826 "EHLO www.enodev.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270486AbTGXFGX (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2003 01:06:23 -0400 Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) From: Shawn To: Tupshin Harper Cc: Hans Reiser , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , reiserfs mailing list In-Reply-To: <3F1F66F0.1050406@tupshin.com> References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com> <3F1F6005.4060307@tupshin.com> <1059021113.7911.13.camel@localhost> <3F1F66F0.1050406@tupshin.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1059024090.9728.22.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 24 Jul 2003 00:21:30 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Looks like the 2.5.74 is the last one of any respectable size. I'm thinking someone forgot a diff switch (N?) over at namesys... Hans? Time to long-distance spank someone? On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 23:56, Tupshin Harper wrote: > Shawn wrote: > > >This is pretty f'ed, but it's on ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/tmp > > > Thanks, but I tried applying the > 2.6.0-test1-reiser4-2.6.0-test1.diff from that location with a lack of > success. > > It applied cleanly, but it doesn't add a fs/reiser4 directory and > asociated contents. Is there an additional patch, or is this one broken? > > -Tupshin >