From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S272470AbTGZM0f (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 26 Jul 2003 08:26:35 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272471AbTGZM0e
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 26 Jul 2003 08:26:34 -0400
Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:56705
	"EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S272470AbTGZM0d (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 26 Jul 2003 08:26:33 -0400
Subject: Re: 2.4 -> 2.2 differences?
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net>
Cc: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki-lkm@lina.inka.de>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030726004753.GA32585@rdlg.net>
References: <E19gC0Z-0001RR-00@calista.inka.de>
	 <1059177773.1204.22.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
	 <20030726004753.GA32585@rdlg.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1059223010.1879.6.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) 
Date: 26 Jul 2003 13:36:51 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sad, 2003-07-26 at 01:47, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> Too bad you don't have anything they gave you or which they took back 
> from you that could be used against them.

Its a matter of archived public record since long ago