archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <>
To: Samuel Thibault <>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: [RFC] single return paradigm
Date: 27 Jul 2003 11:43:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Sad, 2003-07-26 at 23:16, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
> The "single return" paradigm of drivers/char/vt.c:tioclinux() surprised
> me at first glance. But I'm now trying to maintain a patch which adds
> probes at entry and exit of functions for performance instrumenting

gcc will already dop that for you - and the tools already exist to
extract the data I believe (at least Ingo used to have some). When you
tell gcc to build with profiling it provides the right hooks for you to
provide alternate code to the libc profile code

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-27 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-26 22:16 [RFC] single return paradigm Samuel Thibault
2003-07-27 10:43 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2003-07-30  1:02   ` Samuel Thibault
2003-08-17  1:10   ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).