From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S272753AbTG1JWt (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 28 Jul 2003 05:22:49 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272758AbTG1JWt
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 28 Jul 2003 05:22:49 -0400
Received: from 153.Red-213-4-13.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.4.13.153]:36356 "EHLO
	small.felipe-alfaro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S272753AbTG1JWs (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 28 Jul 2003 05:22:48 -0400
Subject: Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches
From: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
To: Diego Calleja =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Garc=EDa?= <diegocg@teleline.es>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, phillips@arcor.de, ed.sweetman@wmich.edu,
       eugene.teo@eugeneteo.net, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       kernel@kolivas.org
In-Reply-To: <20030727010153.7e2e0d48.diegocg@teleline.es>
References: <1059211833.576.13.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>
	 <20030726101015.GA3922@eugeneteo.net> <3F2264DF.7060306@wmich.edu>
	 <200307271046.30318.phillips@arcor.de>
	 <20030726113522.447578d8.akpm@osdl.org>
	 <20030727010153.7e2e0d48.diegocg@teleline.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Message-Id: <1059385080.574.0.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3.99 
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:38:01 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 01:01, Diego Calleja García wrote:

> > It is interesting that Felipe says that stock 2.5.69 was the best CPU
> > scheduler of the 2.5 series.  Do others agree with that?

> No.
> For me, 2.5.63 was the best. Or perhaps it was .64 or .65?

Well, for me now, the best scheduler is 2.6.0-test2 plus Con's O10
patch.