linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@ratnaweera.net>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Contributing to the kernel while being employed
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:13:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1059574407.1759.26.camel@anuradha> (raw)


Slightly off-topic, but not completely ...

(And this has got nothing to do with SCO issue.  I don't like to waste
time on nonexistent issues. ;-))

Shorter version: If I work for a commercial organization, how can I
write a kernel module copyrighted and GPLed by myself?

Now the longer version ...

Before working for a commercial organization, one usually has to sign a
contract which makes all the work done during the period of employment
(including innovations, "hobby" coding done during "after hours")
copyrighted by the employer.  This introduces various problems when one
wishes to do open source development, especially as a hobby.

I am not talking about companies that do open source contributions as
institutions (e.g., JFS, XFS, and numerous device drivers).  But if one
wants to do something as a hobby and host it somewhere (say
sourceforge), or if one wants to send a substantial patch, then it is a
different story.

For example, if I do some changes and send a patch, and hopefully if it
is accepted into the kernel, that code becomes GPL.  But this doesn't
prevent the employer from later questioning my right to do so, because
the patch was never under my copyright according to the contract, and my
applying of GPL (or whatever the lisence I used) is void.

Obviously, there are many folks who work for commercial organizations,
but still actively get involved in the kernel development.  I am keen to
know how they get around with copyright issues and contracts.

Please don't use Linus as an example. ;-)

	Anuradha



             reply	other threads:[~2003-07-30 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-30 14:13 Anuradha Ratnaweera [this message]
2003-07-30 14:36 ` Contributing to the kernel while being employed Wichert Akkerman
2003-07-30 14:38 ` Bas Mevissen
2003-07-30 14:46 ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-30 15:05 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-30 18:42   ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-30 15:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-30 18:54 ` brian
2003-07-31 12:58 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-07-30 14:50 Anuradha Ratnaweera
2003-07-30 14:58 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-30 15:13 ` Bas Mevissen
2003-07-30 15:05 Downing, Thomas
2003-07-30 15:11 Anuradha Ratnaweera
2003-07-30 16:31 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-30 16:58   ` henrique2.gobbi
2003-07-30 17:16     ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-30 17:43       ` Richard B. Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1059574407.1759.26.camel@anuradha \
    --to=anuradha@ratnaweera.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).