From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269612AbTGaVcT (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:32:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269685AbTGaVcR (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:32:17 -0400 Received: from AMarseille-201-1-5-189.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr ([217.128.250.189]:29223 "EHLO gaston") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269623AbTGaVbW (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:31:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Pavel Machek Cc: David Brownell , Alan Stern , Dominik Brugger , kernel list , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20030731140908.GB16463@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <1059153629.528.2.camel@gaston> <3F21B3BF.1030104@pacbell.net> <20030726210123.GD266@elf.ucw.cz> <3F288CAB.6020401@pacbell.net> <20030731094231.GA464@elf.ucw.cz> <3F291B9E.10109@pacbell.net> <20030731140908.GB16463@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1059687033.2417.164.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 31 Jul 2003 23:30:33 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > For what kind of I/O? I do not see a reason for disk to veto > suspend. CD-burner might want to do that, but it still would be bad > idea... (Running on battery, battery goes low, and you destroy your CD > *and* your filesystem. Well... that's userland policy. You can have a notion of "severity" of the suspend request, like vetoing a user-requested suspend request but not one issuing from a very-low-battery warning... This is a part of the PM playfield that still is mostly to be done... Ben.