From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270651AbTHATcV (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:32:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270676AbTHATcV (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:32:21 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:6079 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270651AbTHATcT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:32:19 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <10597663273174@kroah.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI fixes for 2.6.0-test2 In-Reply-To: <10597663232556@kroah.com> From: Greg KH X-Mailer: gregkh_patchbomb Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 12:32:07 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ChangeSet 1.1547.13.2, 2003/08/01 10:13:16-07:00, mitch@sfgoth.com [PATCH] PCI: Trivial DMA-mapping.txt fix As far as I can tell "pci_set_consistent()" doesn't exist - the docs probably meant to say "pci_set_consistent_dma_mask()". Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -Nru a/Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt b/Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt --- a/Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt Fri Aug 1 12:17:38 2003 +++ b/Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt Fri Aug 1 12:17:38 2003 @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ pci_set_consistent_dma_mask() will always be able to set the same or a smaller mask as pci_set_dma_mask(). However for the rare case that a device driver only uses consistent allocations, one would have to -check the return value from pci_set_consistent(). +check the return value from pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(). If your 64-bit device is going to be an enormous consumer of DMA mappings, this can be problematic since the DMA mappings are a