From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270473AbTHCMvO (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Aug 2003 08:51:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271080AbTHCMvN (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Aug 2003 08:51:13 -0400 Received: from quake.mweb.co.za ([196.2.45.76]:47773 "EHLO quake.mweb.co.za") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270473AbTHCMvH (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Aug 2003 08:51:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [2.6] Perl weirdness with ext3 and HTREE From: Martin Schlemmer Reply-To: azarah@gentoo.org To: Alex Tomas Cc: From@mail1.tamperd.net, KML In-Reply-To: References: <1059856625.14962.19.camel@nosferatu.lan> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-kxvjMuhr/G6ORbuuuiqa" Message-Id: <1059915061.8312.11.camel@nosferatu.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 03 Aug 2003 14:51:01 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-kxvjMuhr/G6ORbuuuiqa Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 09:34, Alex Tomas wrote: > could you send full strace for this? >=20 Complete strace can be found here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~azarah/trace.log.bz2 > >>>>> Martin Schlemmer (MS) writes: >=20 > MS> Hi > MS> I have mailed about this previously, but back then it was not > MS> really confirmed, so I have let it be at that. >=20 > MS> Anyhow, problem is that for some reason 2.5/2.6 ext3 with HTREE > MS> support do not like what perl-5.8.0 does during installation. > MS> It *seems* like one of the temporary files created during manpage > MS> installation do not get unlinked properly, or gets into the > MS> hash (this possible?) and cause issues. >=20 > MS> It seems to work flawless on 2.4 still. >=20 > MS> Also, to be honest, I do not have that much free time these days, > MS> so if an interest in helping me/us debug this, it will be appreciate= d > MS> if some direction in what is needed/suggestions can be given as to w= hat > MS> is required. There are a few users that experience this issue, and > MS> I am sure that we can get whatever info needed. >=20 > MS> A bug on our tracker is here with more (hopefully) complete info: >=20 > MS> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D24991 >=20 >=20 > MS> Thanks, >=20 > MS> --=20 >=20 > MS> Martin Schlemmer >=20 >=20 --=20 Martin Schlemmer --=-kxvjMuhr/G6ORbuuuiqa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/LQU1qburzKaJYLYRAhu4AJ9zJOlduvJeFSQGshtxt5Wk3K/9lgCfWctU XtCVG+MnIbLrsii+zhQenr8= =GT/q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-kxvjMuhr/G6ORbuuuiqa--