From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270855AbTHCUzc (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Aug 2003 16:55:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271007AbTHCUzb (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Aug 2003 16:55:31 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust4.swan.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.4]:42137 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270855AbTHCUz1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Aug 2003 16:55:27 -0400 Subject: Re: TOE brain dump From: Alan Cox To: Werner Almesberger Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20030802191411.H5798@almesberger.net> References: <20030802140444.E5798@almesberger.net> <1059857864.20305.14.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030802191411.H5798@almesberger.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1059943881.31900.1.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 03 Aug 2003 21:51:21 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sad, 2003-08-02 at 23:14, Werner Almesberger wrote: > That's taking this idea to an extreme, yes. I'd think of > using something as big as an amd64 for this as "too > expensive", but perhaps it's cheap enough in the long run, > compared to some "optimized" design. Volume makes cheap. If you look at software v hardware raid controllers the hardware people are permanently being killed by the low volume of cards.