From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272864AbTHEQnw (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:43:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272881AbTHEQnw (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:43:52 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust4.swan.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.4]:24704 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272864AbTHEQma (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:42:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.4.22-pre10] SAK: If a process is killed by SAK, give us an info about which one was killed From: Alan Cox To: Pavel Machek Cc: Marc-Christian Petersen , Marcelo Tosatti , lkml In-Reply-To: <20030805105901.GA329@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200307312254.16964.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> <1059739764.18399.0.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030805105901.GA329@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1060101516.1188.7.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 05 Aug 2003 17:38:36 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Maw, 2003-08-05 at 11:59, Pavel Machek wrote: > I agree it is not good enough for 2.4.X, but it looks good to me for > 2.6. That information can be get by ps, right? If we decide it is not > okay to print process names to syslog, maybe oom killer should be > fixed, too? SAK allows me to see what was running without having an account on the box