From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S275360AbTHITOn (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Aug 2003 15:14:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275373AbTHITOn (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Aug 2003 15:14:43 -0400 Received: from smtp2.libero.it ([193.70.192.52]:27022 "EHLO smtp2.libero.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S275360AbTHITOl (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Aug 2003 15:14:41 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] lirc for 2.5/2.6 kernels - 20030802 From: Flameeyes To: Pavel Machek Cc: LKML , LIRC list In-Reply-To: <20030807214311.GC211@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1059820741.3116.24.camel@laurelin> <20030807214311.GC211@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1060456500.12363.2.camel@defiant.flameeyes> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 09 Aug 2003 21:15:01 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 23:43, Pavel Machek wrote: > * What does "For now don't try to use as static version" comment in > lirc_gpio mean. Does it only work as a module? Ok i've tested it out. If i'll build in-kernel bttv and pass to kernel the parameters for the card, lirc_gpio is checked before the bttv itself and result in an error. It need to be built as a module, always. -- Flameeyes