From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: root@chaos.analogic.com
Cc: Dinesh Gandhewar <dinesh_gandhewar@rediffmail.com>,
mlist-linux-kernel@nntp-server.caltech.edu
Subject: Re: volatile variable
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:38:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1060612734.32631.24.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0308110944350.17240@chaos>
I was about to compose a reply contradicting you, but I can't be
bothered. Dinesh -- the answer remains: do not use sleep_on() (you could
perhaps use wait_event() instead though), and do not gratuitously make
your variable volatile.
Richard, you're amusing to read, and have hence escaped my killfiles
because I sometimes find it amusingly tricky to find your mistake --
sometimes I have to read your messages two or three times before I spot
your errors, but they're always there somewhere. It must take a large
amount of effort and skill to present arguments which are so close to
the truth as to appear authoritative, yet introduce errors which are
often so subtle. I cannot imagine that you achieve this so consistently
by accident alone, and respect greatly your ability to do this.
I appreciate the amusement you provide for those who are familiar with
your behaviour -- and interjected on this occasion only because you
seemed to be misleading a newbie who wasn't likely to be aware of your
history, without even much subtlety to your errors.
It may be vaguely amusing for those who are watching from the sidelines
-- but in this instance you seem to be being a little unfair :)
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-11 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-01 10:57 volatile variable Dinesh Gandhewar
2003-08-01 11:38 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-08-11 13:33 ` David Woodhouse
2003-08-11 14:06 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-08-11 14:37 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-08-11 14:38 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2003-08-11 14:40 ` David Howells
2003-08-11 14:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-08-11 17:07 ` Robert Love
2003-08-02 14:52 Harm Verhagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1060612734.32631.24.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=dinesh_gandhewar@rediffmail.com \
--cc=mlist-linux-kernel@nntp-server.caltech.edu \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).