From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272731AbTHPKyG (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Aug 2003 06:54:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272739AbTHPKyG (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Aug 2003 06:54:06 -0400 Received: from mail.cpt.sahara.co.za ([196.41.29.142]:6394 "EHLO workshop.saharact.lan") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272731AbTHPKyE (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Aug 2003 06:54:04 -0400 Subject: Re: increased verbosity in dmesg From: Martin Schlemmer To: gene.heskett@verizon.net Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <200308160438.59489.gene.heskett@verizon.net> References: <200308160438.59489.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1061030883.13257.253.camel@workshop.saharacpt.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 16 Aug 2003 12:48:05 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 10:38, Gene Heskett wrote: > Greetings; > > The recently increased verbosity in the dmesg file is causeing the > "ring buffer" to overflow, and I am not now seeing the first few > pages of the reboot in the dmesg file. > > Is there any quick and dirty way to increase this to at least 32k, or > maybe even to 64k? With half a gig of memory, this shouldn't be a > problem should it? > # dmesg -s 30000 Works here. -- Martin Schlemmer