From: Stian Jordet <liste@jordet.nu>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SOLVED] RE: 2.6.0-test3 latest bk hangs when enabling IO-APIC
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:44:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1061307873.860.1.camel@chevrolet.hybel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030819152657.GA3059@gtf.org>
tir, 19.08.2003 kl. 17.26 skrev Jeff Garzik:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 02:54:01PM +0200, Stian Jordet wrote:
> > tir, 19.08.2003 kl. 05.17 skrev Brown, Len:
> > > > So... concrete suggestions? Overall, IMO, move everything under
> > > > CONFIG_ACPI, or, make CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT a _peer_ option, whose
> > > > selection
> > > > or lackthereof doesn't affect CONFIG_ACPI visibility at all.
> > >
> > > Simply re-naming CONFIG_ACPI_HT to be CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT might help, as it
> > > would be more clear that it is necessary for the rest of ACPI. However,
> > > it may not be obvious that it provides the minimal config to enable HT.
> > >
> > > Re: peers
> > > Unfortunately ACPI doesn't work so well if CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT is left out.
> > > Yes, it's conceivable, but I spent several hours tinkering with it in
> > > search of a "noht" build option, but ditched it b/c it seemed like a
> > > build option very few would use.
> > >
> > > Re: CONFIG_ACPI is the the master switch, and all other ACPI options
> > > subservient...
> > > If implemented literally, this is sort of a pain, as CONFIG_ACPI appears
> > > all over the code. However, a dummy config master ACPI config option
> > > could be used to enable the menu that contains all the rest of ACPI...
> >
> > Btw, (a little off-topic) should I file a bug-report that my motherboard
> > doesn't boot without acpi (never has, not even with 2.4), or should I
> > just smile and be happy because acpi works like a charm? (I already do
> > that :)
>
> Nah... you are actually a member of the growing number of people with
> computers that require ACPI to boot. It's something that will become
> more and more common and times goes on. Nothing really to "fix" in the
> kernel besides turning on ACPI...
Ok, thanks. Just a note, this isn't a new board, it's almost precisely
two years old.
Thanks :)
Regards,
Stian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-19 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-19 3:17 [SOLVED] RE: 2.6.0-test3 latest bk hangs when enabling IO-APIC Brown, Len
2003-08-19 12:54 ` Stian Jordet
2003-08-19 15:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-19 15:44 ` Stian Jordet [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-19 1:15 Brown, Len
2003-08-19 1:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-19 7:22 ` Stian Jordet
2003-08-22 2:11 ` Mark W. Alexander
2003-08-18 17:53 Brown, Len
2003-08-18 19:23 ` Stian Jordet
2003-08-18 20:06 ` Stian Jordet
2003-08-18 23:06 ` [SOLVED] " Stian Jordet
2003-08-18 23:12 ` Stian Jordet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1061307873.860.1.camel@chevrolet.hybel \
--to=liste@jordet.nu \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).