From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261530AbTHSXcF (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:32:05 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261547AbTHSXcF
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:32:05 -0400
Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com ([192.108.102.143]:62744 "EHLO
	smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S261530AbTHSXcE (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:32:04 -0400
Subject: Re: SCO's "proof"
From: "Andrei Barbu \"T'Eval\"" <teval@myrealbox.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <3F422809.7080806@yahoo.com>
References: <3F422809.7080806@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1061336053.6603.2.camel@quantum.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 
Date: 19 Aug 2003 19:34:14 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

The first image seems usless
Comments are not acceptable in this type of case, that was ruled in
court before over AT&T vs Berkely.
So.. it's completely irrelevant in the real world. As for the 2nd they'd
still have to go a long way twoards proving they didn't steal it.