From: Paul Larson <plars@linuxtestproject.org>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ltp-results <ltp-results@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linstab@osdl.org
Subject: LTP nightly regression results for 2.6.0-test3-bk2,bk3,bk5,bk6,bk7,mm3,mjb1
Date: 20 Aug 2003 16:30:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1061415052.3909.1733.camel@plars> (raw)
Here's the latest batch of LTP test results for the latest 2.6 bk
snapshots and mm/mjb trees. These results and previous results are
archived at: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/
Thanks,
Paul Larson
2.6.0-test3-bk1-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk2
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk1-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk2/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk1 2.6.0-test3-bk2 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
setegid01 FAIL PASS N Y
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
2.6.0-test3-bk2-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk3
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk2-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk3/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk2 2.6.0-test3-bk3 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
gettimeofday PASS FAIL Y N
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
syslog04 PASS FAIL Y N
*** bk4 failed to compile, but the failure was quickly fixed in bk5 ***
2.6.0-test3-bk3-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk5
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk3-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk5/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk3 2.6.0-test3-bk5 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
gettimeofday FAIL PASS N Y
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
syslog04 FAIL FAIL N N
2.6.0-test3-bk5-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk6
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk5-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk6/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk5 2.6.0-test3-bk6 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
syslog04 FAIL PASS N Y
2.6.0-test3-bk6-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk7
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk6-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk7/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk6 2.6.0-test3-bk7 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
gettimeofday PASS FAIL Y N
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
syslog04 PASS FAIL Y N
2.6.0-test3-mm2-vs-2.6.0-test3-mm3
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-mm2-vs-2.6.0-test3-mm3/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-mm2 2.6.0-test3-mm3 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
2.6.0-test3-vs-2.6.0-test3-mjb1
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-vs-2.6.0-test3-mjb1/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3 2.6.0-test3-mjb1 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
setegid01 FAIL PASS N Y
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
next reply other threads:[~2003-08-20 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-20 21:30 Paul Larson [this message]
2003-08-21 4:56 ` LTP nightly regression results for 2.6.0-test3-bk2,bk3,bk5,bk6,bk7,mm3,mjb1 George Anzinger
2003-08-21 9:25 ` George Anzinger
2003-08-25 16:11 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1061415052.3909.1733.camel@plars \
--to=plars@linuxtestproject.org \
--cc=linstab@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp-results@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).