From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:38:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:37:54 -0400 Received: from firewall.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.9]:64755 "EHLO ocs4.ocs-net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:37:39 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: "David S. Miller" cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 13 Jun 2001 07:15:31 MST." <15143.30083.146128.113723@pizda.ninka.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:37:23 +1000 Message-ID: <10620.992443043@ocs4.ocs-net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 07:15:31 -0700 (PDT), "David S. Miller" wrote: >Surely this is a smaller hammer than making them all NOVERS(), I >think all of these workarounds with novers for assembly are silly and >are merely looking for a solution which nobody (perhaps except me :-) >is bothering to look for. modversions.h will disappear in 2.5 anyway, and be replaced with a cleaner system of symbol versions which does not rely on pre-processor fudging of symbol names. It should be able to handle assembler as well as C.