From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264318AbTH1V6t (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:58:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264361AbTH1V6s (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:58:48 -0400 Received: from 153.Red-213-4-13.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.4.13.153]:20486 "EHLO small.felipe-alfaro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264318AbTH1V6r (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:58:47 -0400 Subject: Re: State of the CFQ scheduler From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Jens Axboe Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <20030828194743.GH16684@suse.de> References: <1062078948.17363.4.camel@pilot.stavtrup-st.dk> <20030828194743.GH16684@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1062107920.665.0.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:58:40 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 21:47, Jens Axboe wrote: > It shouldn't be too hard to adapt the latest version from before -mm > dropped it and adapting to the current kernels. If you want to give that > a go, I'd be happy to help you out. Why don't you post a patch against 2.6.0-test4 or 2.6.0-test4-mm1 on LKML? I would like to start using CFQ again :-)