From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] linux-2.6.0-test4_cyclone-hpet-fix_A0
Date: 04 Sep 2003 10:53:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1062698030.1315.1544.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C8C38546F90ABF408A5961FC01FDBF1902C7D23C@fmsmsx405.fm.intel.com>
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 10:21, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> > Can we not we avoid the cut-n-paste coding?
> >
> > There is also timer_tsc.c:calibrate_tsc_hpet() which is
> > almost the same as
> > timer_hpet.c:calibrate_tsc(). Seem to me that we could tweak
> > calibrate_tsc_hpet() a bit, unstaticalise
> > timer_tsc.c:calibrate_tsc() and
> > have two functions rather than four?
> >
>
>
> How about the attached patch (against mm4), that moves all
> calibrate tsc functions into a common file, avoiding the duplication.
> This time I could successfully compile cyclone timer too :). However,
Looks better, any reason calibrate_tsc and calibrate_tsc_hpet can't be
unified (it looks like the same basic code just talking to different
hardware)? I was planning on giving that a shot later today.
> I had to do an unrelated one line change in fixmap (last chunk in
> the patch) to compile for summit.
Is this just an -mm only thing (2.5 has _X86_CYCLONE_TIMER everywhere)?
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-04 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-04 17:21 [PATCH] linux-2.6.0-test4_cyclone-hpet-fix_A0 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2003-09-04 17:53 ` john stultz [this message]
2003-09-04 18:04 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-04 18:23 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2003-09-04 4:29 john stultz
2003-09-04 5:59 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-04 7:14 ` john stultz
2003-09-04 14:48 ` Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1062698030.1315.1544.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).