From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261642AbTIOWbh (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:31:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261662AbTIOWbh (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:31:37 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust4.swan.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.4]:36515 "EHLO dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261642AbTIOWbg (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:31:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6 workaround for Athlon/Opteron prefetch errata From: Alan Cox To: John Bradford Cc: davidsen@tmr.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , zwane@linuxpower.ca In-Reply-To: <200309151934.h8FJYI84002544@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> References: <200309151934.h8FJYI84002544@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1063664888.8256.25.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 (1.4.4-6) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 23:28:09 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Llu, 2003-09-15 at 20:34, John Bradford wrote: > Yes, you're right, from a stability point of view I was being a bit > impractical. Any idea how many developers are actually regularly > testing code on 386s these days, by the way? I test 486 still but not 386. Even finding embedded 386 stuff that isnt obsolete is hard nowdays (6117 etc).