From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263472AbTI2OqP (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:46:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263475AbTI2OqP (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:46:15 -0400 Received: from pub237.cambridge.redhat.com ([213.86.99.237]:52422 "EHLO executor.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263472AbTI2OqM (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:46:12 -0400 Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6 From: David Woodhouse To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Adrian Bunk , netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@redhat.com, pekkas@netcore.fi, lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200309291438.h8TEcVtH021550@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <20030928225941.GW15338@fs.tum.de> <20030928231842.GE1039@conectiva.com.br> <20030928232403.GX15338@fs.tum.de> <20030928233909.GG1039@conectiva.com.br> <20030929001439.GY15338@fs.tum.de> <20030929003229.GM1039@conectiva.com.br> <1064826174.29569.13.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <20030929141548.GS1039@conectiva.com.br> <200309291438.h8TEcVtH021550@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064846768.21551.15.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-2.dwmw2.3) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:46:08 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:38 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > No, this is the behavior we want, and we can write Kconfig help entries that > explain it. > > Anybody want to do a sanity check against CONFIG_IP6_NF_IPTABLES - that > looks like another gotcha if it isn't implemented properly (it may be, I just haven't > actually looked it over)? In 2.7 we really should just stop the CONFIG_xxx_MODULE definitions being available during builds of the static kernel. -- dwmw2