From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262874AbTJ3VHl (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:07:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262878AbTJ3VHl (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:07:41 -0500 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.104]:5570 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262874AbTJ3VHk (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:07:40 -0500 Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 2.6.0-test9-mjb1 From: Dave Hansen To: Jeff Garzik Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-kernel , LSE In-Reply-To: <3FA171DD.5060406@pobox.com> References: <14860000.1067544022@flay> <3FA171DD.5060406@pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1067548047.1028.19.camel@nighthawk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 30 Oct 2003 13:07:27 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 12:17, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > e1000 fixes > Um... any e1000 fixes you have, please forward them to me and Intel > rather than letting them languish in a tree. There aren't any in there right now. The patches that Martin is referring to were probably a couple from Anton that got fixed and merged long, long ago. There's one that we keep around for ppc64, but it's not applicable to any other architectures and it's not really mainline material anyway. I think Martin needs to update his list. -- Dave Hansen haveblue@us.ibm.com