On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 19:37, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 19:36:39 +0200
> Martin Schlemmer <azarah@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 04:19, David S. Miller wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 02:16, Thomas Horsten wrote: 
> > > > The following patch fixes the problem:
> > >
> > > Making the u64 swabbing functions unavailable is not an 
> > > acceptable solution. 
> > >
> > 
> > Sorry to dig this up again, but wont __STRICT_ANSI__ assume
> > that the program will not use u64 functions (as the program/compiler
> > is supposed to adhere to ansi standards)?
> 
> It may make indirect use of inline functions in the kernel headers
> in question, which themselves need to use the u64 type.

Right, thanks.


-- 

Martin Schlemmer