linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua Schmidlkofer <kernel@pacrimopen.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID-0 read perf. decrease after 2.4.20
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:01:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1069736477.1552.11.camel@menion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031124100534.24941.qmail@web13902.mail.yahoo.com>

On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 02:05, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> >Hello All!
> >
> >Has anyone else experienced a drastic drop in read performance on
> >software
> >RAID-0 with post 2.4.20 kernels? We have a few Athlon XP's here at our
> >lab with double IDE disks on different channels set up as RAID-0. Some
> >bonnie++ benchmark results with various kernels, on the same machine
> >(Athlon XP 2400+, 2 GHz, 1.5 GB RAM, VIA chipset, 2*Maxtor 120 GB
> >6Y060L0):
> >write read
> >2.4.20-ac1: 88,000 135,000 K/sec
> >2.4.21-pre7: 93,000 75,000
> >2.4.22-ac4: 94,000 82,000
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  I can attest a similar drop in read performance on a IA64 box going
> from a 2.4.19ish kernel to 2.4.22. In our setup the RAID0 is LVM, not
> MD.The RAID is used a a scratch device for a out-of-core finite element
> program (NASTRAN).
> 
>  The setup is some 20 disks on 4 controllers. "iozone" read/reread
> Performance went from about 400MB/sec to 260 MB/sec, while write went
> up a notch. Unfortunatelly the read performance is more important for
> the application in question.
> 
>  Due to the fact that I have no controll over the use of the system I
> cannot make any experiments to find out what killed performance. Sorry
> :-(
> 
> Martin
> 
> =====
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Knoblauch
> email: knobi@knobisoft.de or knobi@rocketmail.com
> www:   http://www.knobisoft.de
> 
> 

And this isn't the read-ahead size change thing?


  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-25  5:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-24 10:05 RAID-0 read perf. decrease after 2.4.20 Martin Knoblauch
2003-11-25  5:01 ` Joshua Schmidlkofer [this message]
2003-11-25 13:38   ` Superior disk perf. of 2.4.20-ac (Was: RAID-0 read perf. decrease after 2.4.20) Mikael Johansson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-16 12:51 RAID-0 read perf. decrease after 2.4.20 Martin Knoblauch
2003-12-18 13:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-18 14:37   ` Martin Knoblauch
2004-07-04 23:28     ` Mikael Johansson
2003-12-18 19:13   ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-18 19:17     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-11-25  9:41 Martin Knoblauch
2003-11-20 16:45 Mikael Johansson
2003-11-21 13:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-11-21 19:56   ` Mikael Johansson
2003-12-08 12:47     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-08 13:11       ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-12-08 13:21         ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1069736477.1552.11.camel@menion.home \
    --to=kernel@pacrimopen.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).