Re: XFS for 2.4

[Eric Sandall <eric@sandall.us>]

Quoting Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>:
> On Dec-02 2003, Tue, 16:01 -0200
> Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > Its too late for it to be included in 2.4. Use 2.6 or a modified 2.4 tree.
> 
> 
> A: Looking good, come back later, though.
> B: Ok.
> A: Come back later.
> B: Ok.
> A: Come back later.
> B: Ok.
> A: Come back later.
> B: Ok.
> A: Sorry, you're too late.
> B: W--What?
> A: You heard me.  (Also I don't like your shoes.)
> 
> 
> (Sounds a bit like Monty Python to me, can't help it.)

You know, that's what I've been thinking this whole time. Almost sounds like
someone has a grudge against XFS (or something/someone related to XFS).

Just my non-technical opinion.

-sandalle

-- 
PGP Key Fingerprint:  FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91  FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric@sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.