From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263605AbTLEHBv (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 02:01:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263902AbTLEHBv (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 02:01:51 -0500 Received: from legolas.restena.lu ([158.64.1.34]:52170 "EHLO smtp.restena.lu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263605AbTLEHBr (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 02:01:47 -0500 Subject: Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11) - IRQ flood related ? From: Craig Bradney To: Bob Cc: linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <3FD01BE0.5030807@nishanet.com> References: <3FCF25F2.6060008@netzentry.com> <1070551149.4063.8.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> <20031204163243.GA10471@forming> <20031204175548.GB10471@forming> <20031204200208.GA4167@localnet> <20031204230528.GA189@tesore.local> <3FCFBFC3.5070403@gmx.de> <1070580108.4100.8.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> <3FD01BE0.5030807@nishanet.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1070607704.4100.11.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 08:01:44 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org nforce net is off. 3com is on. (in bios) Craig On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 06:47, Bob wrote: > Do you have onboard ethernet enabled with nforce2 > mboard? I am fine with pre-emptive kernel but have > to disable onboard ethernet in cmos setup or I see > "Disabling IRQ7" and problems develop. > > -Bob > > Craig Bradney wrote: > > >Prakash, > > > >try it without preempt.. just to see. As soon as I removed it today the > >crashes went away (for 5 hours).. PC is now up for 2.5 hours and I'm > >waiting to see if it will be 5 hrs or 5 days this time around :) > > > >Craig > > > >On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 00:14, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: > > > > > >>Jesse Allen wrote: > >> > >> > >>>On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:02:08PM +0100, cheuche+lkml@free.fr wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hello, > >>>> > >>>>Along with the lockups already described here, I've noticed an > >>>>unidentified source of interrupts on IRQ7. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>I wonder if people experiencing lockup problems also have these > >>>>noise interrupts, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>I just took a look at this, by setting up parport_pc, and yes I get noise. > >>> > >>>This was my first sample with a kernel with APIC: > >>> 7: 29230 IO-APIC-edge parport0 > >>> > >>> > >>I just did an experminent with a very light kernel, nearly nothing > >>compiled inside, except apic acpi, preempt and needed stuff plus > >>scsi+libata and no ide. IRQ 7 was not present and every device had its > >>own irq. Nevertheless system locked up at second hdparm run... > >> > >>Prakash > >> > >>- > >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > >>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > >>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > >> > >> > >> > > > >- > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >