From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265304AbTLGAUf (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 19:20:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265305AbTLGAUf (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 19:20:35 -0500 Received: from legolas.restena.lu ([158.64.1.34]:12753 "EHLO smtp.restena.lu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265304AbTLGAUa (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 19:20:30 -0500 Subject: Re: Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog - found? From: Craig Bradney To: Ian Kumlien Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1070739194.1985.4.camel@big.pomac.com> References: <1070739194.1985.4.camel@big.pomac.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1070756427.2093.2.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 01:20:27 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 20:33, Ian Kumlien wrote: > Hi, i'm now running this patch and it survived my grep in /usr/src. > > It's mainly a correction of the apic patch and the ACPI halt disconnect > patch that was originally done for 2.6... Correction? how so? code looks the same, although the line numbers are completely different for mpparse.c and at that location there is different code. (Havent checked the disconnect) Or do u just mean combination of the two patches? > > I'll get back to you about uptime, but i think this is it... Why do you think the disconnect is also related? (given some are just running the APIC patch and having (less/)no issues? > > Although i would prefer a not so workaroundish approach =) 23 hrs now.. Craig