From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263189AbTLJNWY (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:22:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263081AbTLJNWY (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:22:24 -0500 Received: from head.linpro.no ([80.232.36.1]:29072 "EHLO head.linpro.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263189AbTLJNWW (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:22:22 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.4: mylex and > 2GB RAM From: Per Buer Reply-To: perbu@linpro.no To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Linpro AS Message-Id: <1071062497.32441.20.camel@netstat.linpro.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:21:37 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1AU4I9-0004wg-GP*nZ6SjmYSxF6* Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marcelo, On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 11:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > You may want to give 2.4.23 a try. > > The VM has been changed to balance the memory in a "saner" way wrt > highmem. All I can say is that it is somewhat better - but far from good. When writing intensively prosesses more or less lock up when we run out of Lowmem. 2.4.23 seems to recover from this state faster then 2.4.22 - but I cant really quantify this in any way. -- There are only 10 different kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary, and those who don't.