From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265346AbTLNFKG (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2003 00:10:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265350AbTLNFKG (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2003 00:10:06 -0500 Received: from smtp1.clear.net.nz ([203.97.33.27]:707 "EHLO smtp1.clear.net.nz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265346AbTLNFKC (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2003 00:10:02 -0500 Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:38:10 +1300 From: Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree In-reply-to: <20031212192252.GA465@elf.ucw.cz> To: Pavel Machek Cc: Michael Frank , Linux Kernel Mailing List Message-id: <1071376690.2187.25.camel@laptop-linux> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4-8mdk Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <200312110537.17496.mhf@linuxmail.org> <20031212192252.GA465@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org That's a bit rough, isn't it Pavel? I fully agree that the power management support in 2.4 is incomplete (just as is the case in 2.6), but there is power management support in 2.4, and it is being used. Regards, Nigel On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 08:22, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > swsusp is useful feature also for 2.4. Could this please be merged. > > 2.4 has no driver model => swsusp for 2.4 is a hack. Its nice and > working, but it is still a hack. > Pavel -- My work on Software Suspend is graciously brought to you by LinuxFund.org.