On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 21:53, walt wrote:
> Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 00:17, walt wrote:
> 
> >> ...I have  not been able to get udev working yet...
> 
> > Hmm, It works fine here?  I was under the impression that
>  > it should _just_work_ if you have latest everything unstable...
> 
> Yes!  I want to confirm that it DOES 'just work' with this one
> little thingy I missed:
> 
> I needed to add TWO boot flags because of the way I have my
> kernel configured:  'nodevfs' AND 'devfs=nomount'.
> 
> Without the 'devfs=nomount' flag the kernel was starting devfsd
> anyway, which keeps udev from working, apparently.
> 

Hmm, right, that will do it.

Perhaps I could change this to display a warning if udev is present,
but devfs is mounted over /dev ...


-- 
Martin Schlemmer