From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264364AbUAMQTM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:19:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264368AbUAMQTM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:19:12 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.86.99.235]:20203 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264364AbUAMQTL (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:19:11 -0500 Subject: Re: a symbol defined twice is ok? From: David Woodhouse To: Samium Gromoff Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <87fzejua2e.wl@canopus.ns.zel.ru> References: <87fzejua2e.wl@canopus.ns.zel.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1074010747.17620.88.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-8.dwmw2.2) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:19:08 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 18:45 +0300, Samium Gromoff wrote: > this is 2.4.20`s System.map: > > deepfire@canopus:~$ cat kernel/k/System.map | cut -f3 -d\ | sort | uniq -d | wc -l > 33 It's fine -- they'll all be static symbols. -- dwmw2