From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265553AbUATQ1k (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:27:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265568AbUATQ1k (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:27:40 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:50413 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265553AbUATQ1h (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:27:37 -0500 Subject: Re: filesystem bug? From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: tsuchiya@labs.fujitsu.com Cc: linux-kernel , Stephen Tweedie In-Reply-To: <400CE873.3000204@labs.fujitsu.com> References: <4007537F.4070609@labs.fujitsu.com> <1074256175.4006.24.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> <400B8CD4.8000503@labs.fujitsu.com> <1074517928.3694.22.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> <400CE873.3000204@labs.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1074616047.4195.17.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 20 Jan 2004 16:27:28 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 08:36, Tsuchiya Yoshihiro wrote: > >http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/patch@1.1136.67.1 > 2. some time, i_nlink was 0 and i_dtime was set which is I think > somewhat related with this patch, but the other time, > part of a inode block was cleaned with 0, which I do not understand > how at all. Yep. I'd really need to see exactly which kernel versions these specific problems reproduce on to take this much further, though. I'll be travelling for the next week and a half, but I'll look for more results once I'm back from that. Thanks, Stephen