From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264047AbUCZN0J (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:26:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264048AbUCZN0I (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:26:08 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:26029 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264047AbUCZN0G (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:26:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockfs patch for 2.6 From: Chris Mason To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20040326102549.A4248@infradead.org> References: <1078867885.25075.1458.camel@watt.suse.com> <20040313131447.A25900@infradead.org> <1079191213.4187.243.camel@watt.suse.com> <20040313163346.A27004@infradead.org> <20040314140032.A8901@infradead.org> <1079277810.4183.249.camel@watt.suse.com> <20040326102549.A4248@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1080307694.2820.81.camel@watt.suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:28:14 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 05:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:23:31AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > > > P.S. this patch now kills 16 lines of kernel code summarized :) > > > > > > > It looks good, I'll give it a try. > > ping? I've seen you merged the old patch into the suse tree, and having > shipping distros with incompatible APIs doesn't sound exactly like a good > idea.. I'm replacing the old one in the suse tree, I just got sucked into to a few critical tasks. Yours is the way to go. -chris