From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6510C47083 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 04:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E4961104 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 04:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232270AbhEXE70 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2021 00:59:26 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:39312 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229824AbhEXE7Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2021 00:59:24 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73C9ED1; Sun, 23 May 2021 21:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.163.81.29] (unknown [10.163.81.29]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67B593F73B; Sun, 23 May 2021 21:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC V2] mm: Enable generic pfn_valid() to handle early sections with memmap holes To: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: david@redhat.com, rppt@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210422061902.21614-1-rppt@kernel.org> <1619077823-3819-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: <10e5eecf-3ef5-f691-f38a-7ca305b707c1@arm.com> Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 10:28:32 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1619077823-3819-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/22/21 1:20 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > Platforms like arm and arm64 have redefined pfn_valid() because their early > memory sections might have contained memmap holes after freeing parts of it > during boot, which should be skipped while validating a pfn for struct page > backing. This scenario on certain platforms where memmap is not continuous, > could be captured with a new option CONFIG_HAVE_EARLY_SECTION_MEMMAP_HOLES. > Then the generic pfn_valid() can be improved to accommodate such platforms. > This reduces overall code footprint and also improves maintainability. > > free_unused_memmap() and pfn_to_online_page() have been updated to include > such cases. This also exports memblock_is_memory() for all drivers that use > pfn_valid() but lack required visibility. After the new config is in place, > drop CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID from arm64 platforms. > > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Cc: Will Deacon > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: Mike Rapoport > Cc: David Hildenbrand > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual > --- > This patch applies on the latest mainline kernel after Mike's series > regarding arm64 based pfn_valid(). > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210422061902.21614-1-rppt@kernel.org/T/#t > > Changes in RFC V2: > > - Dropped support for arm (32 bit) > - Replaced memblock_is_map_memory() check with memblock_is_memory() > - MEMBLOCK_NOMAP memory are no longer skipped for pfn_valid() > - Updated pfn_to_online_page() per David > - Updated free_unused_memmap() to preserve existing semantics per Mike > - Exported memblock_is_memory() instead of memblock_is_map_memory() > > Changes in RFC V1: > > - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mm/patch/1615174073-10520-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/ > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 +- > arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h | 1 - > arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 41 ----------------------------------- > include/linux/mmzone.h | 18 ++++++++++++++- > mm/Kconfig | 9 ++++++++ > mm/memblock.c | 8 +++++-- > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 +++++ > 7 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > index b4a9b493ce72..4cdc3570ffa9 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -144,7 +144,6 @@ config ARM64 > select HAVE_ARCH_KGDB > select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS > select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_COMPAT_BITS if COMPAT > - select HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID > select HAVE_ARCH_PREL32_RELOCATIONS > select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER > select HAVE_ARCH_STACKLEAK > @@ -167,6 +166,7 @@ config ARM64 > if $(cc-option,-fpatchable-function-entry=2) > select FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY \ > if DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS > + select HAVE_EARLY_SECTION_MEMMAP_HOLES > select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS > select HAVE_FAST_GUP > select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h > index 75ddfe671393..fcbef3eec4b2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h > @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ void copy_highpage(struct page *to, struct page *from); > > typedef struct page *pgtable_t; > > -int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn); > int pfn_is_map_memory(unsigned long pfn); > > #include > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > index f431b38d0837..5731a11550d8 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > @@ -217,47 +217,6 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max) > free_area_init(max_zone_pfns); > } > > -int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn) > -{ > - phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn); > - > - /* > - * Ensure the upper PAGE_SHIFT bits are clear in the > - * pfn. Else it might lead to false positives when > - * some of the upper bits are set, but the lower bits > - * match a valid pfn. > - */ > - if (PHYS_PFN(addr) != pfn) > - return 0; > - > -#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM > -{ > - struct mem_section *ms; > - > - if (pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS) > - return 0; > - > - ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn); > - if (!valid_section(ms)) > - return 0; > - > - /* > - * ZONE_DEVICE memory does not have the memblock entries. > - * memblock_is_memory() check for ZONE_DEVICE based > - * addresses will always fail. Even the normal hotplugged > - * memory will never have MEMBLOCK_NOMAP flag set in their > - * memblock entries. Skip memblock search for all non early > - * memory sections covering all of hotplug memory including > - * both normal and ZONE_DEVICE based. > - */ > - if (!early_section(ms)) > - return pfn_section_valid(ms, pfn); > -} > -#endif > - return memblock_is_memory(addr); > -} > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(pfn_valid); > - > int pfn_is_map_memory(unsigned long pfn) > { > phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn); > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h > index 961f0eeefb62..18bf71665211 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h > @@ -1421,10 +1421,22 @@ static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn) > * > * Return: 1 for PFNs that have memory map entries and 0 otherwise > */ > +bool memblock_is_memory(phys_addr_t addr); > + > static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn) > { > + phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn); > struct mem_section *ms; > > + /* > + * Ensure the upper PAGE_SHIFT bits are clear in the > + * pfn. Else it might lead to false positives when > + * some of the upper bits are set, but the lower bits > + * match a valid pfn. > + */ > + if (PHYS_PFN(addr) != pfn) > + return 0; > + > if (pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS) > return 0; > ms = __nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)); > @@ -1434,7 +1446,11 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn) > * Traditionally early sections always returned pfn_valid() for > * the entire section-sized span. > */ > - return early_section(ms) || pfn_section_valid(ms, pfn); > + if (early_section(ms)) > + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EARLY_SECTION_MEMMAP_HOLES) ? > + memblock_is_memory(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) : 1; > + > + return pfn_section_valid(ms, pfn); > } > #endif Hello David/Mike, Now that pfn_is_map_memory() usage has been decoupled from pfn_valid() and SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP is only available memory model on arm64, wondering if we still need this HAVE_EARLY_SECTION_MEMMAP_HOLES proposal ? Please do kindly suggest. Thank you. - Anshuman