From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261266AbVABPnH (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:43:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261271AbVABPmc (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:42:32 -0500 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:50349 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261261AbVABPlM (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:41:12 -0500 Subject: Re: printk loglevel policy? From: Alan Cox To: Coywolf Qi Hunt Cc: Jesper Juhl , David Howells , LKML In-Reply-To: <2cd57c9004123018203b7e38ef@mail.gmail.com> References: <2cd57c9004123018203b7e38ef@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1104675855.15004.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:36:54 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Gwe, 2004-12-31 at 02:20, Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently, I've seen a lot of add loglevel to printk patches. > grep 'printk("' -r | wc shows me 2433. There are probably 2433 printk > need to patch, is it? What's this printk loglevel policy, all these You would need to work out which were at the start of a newline - most of them are probably just fine and valid